Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs & Provost
Inside the Provost’s Office:
Major Offices & Academic Initiatives:
- Accountability and Compact Planning
- Equity and Diversity
- Faculty and Academic Affairs
- Graduate Education
- Institutional and Academic Program Review
- Instructional Technology
- Interdisciplinary Initiatives
- Promotion and Tenure
- Student Affairs
- Teaching and Learning
- Undergraduate Education
-
Academic Rankings & Awards:
- Academic Rankings
- Faculty Awards—National and International
- Faculty Awards—University
- Student Awards—National and International
About the Provost’s Office:
- Office Directory
- Policies
- Reports and Communications
Home > Undergraduate Education > Reports and Analyses >Summary of Student Metrics from the 2007-08 University Plan, Performance and Accountability Report: Twin Cities Undergraduate Students
Summary of Student Metrics from the 2007-08 University Plan, Performance and Accountability Report: Twin Cities Undergraduate Students
Report from the Vice Provost and Dean of Undergraduate Education to the University of Minnesota Board of Regents, October 2007.
(note: to resize the presentation for full-screen, click the button in the upper right corner on the module below)
Read this doc on Scribd: Summary of Student Metrics
Summary of Student Metrics from the 2007-08 University Plan, Performance, and Accountability Report: Twin Cities Undergraduate Students A Presentation to the Faculty, Staff, and Student Affairs Committee of the Board of Regents, October 2007 Craig Swan, Vice Provost and Dean of Undergraduate Education Freshman Applications and Admissions, 1997-2007 Applications 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 1997 2002 2007 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 Admits 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 1997 1997 2002 2002 2007 2007 Enrolled 5,500 25% SOC Percentage 5,000 20% 4,500 15% 4,000 1997 2002 2007 10% 1997 2002 2007 Measures of Incoming Freshman Class Quality, 1997-2007 Top 10% of High School Graduating Class 100% Top 25% of High School Graduating Class 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1997 2002 2007 40% 20% 1997 2002 2007 80% 60% Top 50% of High School Graduating Class 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 1997 2002 2007 26.5 26.0 25.5 25.0 24.5 24.0 23.5 23.0 1997 ACT 2002 2007 Then and Now: Changes in the Undergraduate Experience 1996-2006 1996-97 Percent of freshmen living on campus Percent of undergraduates who identify themselves as commuter students Percent of undergraduates who participated in student organizations or activities Percent of students who are not working at a paid job while in school 71% 47% 2006-07 81% 35% Change +10% -12% 50% 74% +24% 26% 26% 0% Then and Now: Changes in the Undergraduate Experience 1996-2006 1996-97 Percent of students rating the overall quality of academic programs as excellent or good Percent of students rating classroom quality as excellent or very good Percent satisfied 78% 2006-07 89% Change +11% 42% 82% +40% 82% 91% +9% First Year Retention of Twin Cities Campus Fall NHS Cohorts By Average High School Rank Percentage, Percentage in Residence Halls, and Program Initiation Milestones 90.0 13-Credit Rule, Midterm Alerts Graduation Planner Living-learning communities Semester Conversion, Freshman Seminars Convocation 85.0 % Retained in 2nd Year 80.0 75.0 70.0 65.0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Ave HSR 2001 2002 % in Res Halls 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 % Retained Linear (% Retained) Proportion of Entering NHS Students Still Registered and Hitting 30, 60, and 90 Credit Benchmarks, 1, 2, and 3 Years from Entry 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 30 Credits After 1st year 60 Credits After 2nd year 90 Credits After 3rd year F 1999 F 2000 F 2001 F 2002 F 2003 F 2004 F 2005 F 2006 Proportion of Entering NHS Students Still Registered and Hitting 30, 60, and 90 Credit Benchmarks, 1, 2, and 3 Years from Entry 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 30 Credits After 1st year 60 Credits After 2nd year 90 Credits After 3rd year F 1999 F 2000 F 2001 F 2002 F 2003 F 2004 F 2005 F 2006 Comparisons of State Populations, High School Graduate Numbers and Enrollees at UM Aspirational Peer Flagship Universities, Fall 2006 New Frosh/ State Grads 1.1% 1.2% 3.0% 4.6% 5.3% 5.8% 5.1% 5.0% 8.7% 8.7% 8.7% Frosh % in Top 10% HS Rank 99% 97% 70% 72% 55% 37% 43% 90% 84% 58% 39% New Frosh % SOC 61.2% 60.5% 42.3% 35.9% 28.5% 12.9% 16.0% 23.7% 39.0% 14.2% 20.2% New Freshmen University of California, Berkeley University of California, Los Angeles University of Texas, Austin University of Florida University of Illinois, UrbanaChampaign Pennsylvania State University, Univ Park Ohio State University, Columbus University of Michigan, Ann Arbor University of Washington, Seattle University of Wisconsin, Madison University of Minnesota, Twin Cities 4,157 4,810 7,417 6,702 7,172 8,039 6,280 5,399 5,475 5,643 5,439 Calculated ACT Score 30.0 28.5 26.7 27.6 27.8 26.0 26.3 29.4 25.9 28.3 25.2 HS Grads % SOC 59.3% 59.3% 53.6% 43.8% 31.2% 16.9% 14.0% 20.2% 24.4% 13.6% 14.1% Graduation Rates at Peer Universities 4 yr 5 yr 6 yr Penn State UCLA UC Berkeley Michigan Illinois Wisconsin Florida Texas Washington Ohio State Minnesota 64.9% 62.2% 63.8% 70.3% 62.5% 50.4% 55.0% 48.1% 51.2% 42.3% 40.6% 87.8% 86.2% 84.5% 85.7% 77.9% 76.3% 75.6% 72.6% 71.1% 65.8% 57.7% 90.1% 89.2% 88.9% 86.9% 81.5% 79.2% 79.0% 76.9% 74.8% 71.1% 60.5% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 6 yr 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 1992 1996 2000 Entering Cohort 2004 2008 4 yr Twin Cities Campus 5 yr 60 % - 4 yr 80% - 6 yr 75% - 5 yr Graduation Rates and Goals
Summary of Student Metrics from the 2007-08 University Plan, Performance, and Accountability Report: Twin Cities Undergraduate Students A Presentation to the Faculty, Staff, and Student Affairs Committee of the Board of Regents, October 2007 Craig Swan, Vice Provost and Dean of Undergraduate Education Freshman Applications and Admissions, 1997-2007 Applications 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 1997 2002 2007 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 Admits 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 1997 1997 2002 2002 2007 2007 Enrolled 5,500 25% SOC Percentage 5,000 20% 4,500 15% 4,000 1997 2002 2007 10% 1997 2002 2007 Measures of Incoming Freshman Class Quality, 1997-2007 Top 10% of High School Graduating Class 100% Top 25% of High School Graduating Class 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1997 2002 2007 40% 20% 1997 2002 2007 80% 60% Top 50% of High School Graduating Class 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 1997 2002 2007 26.5 26.0 25.5 25.0 24.5 24.0 23.5 23.0 1997 ACT 2002 2007 Then and Now: Changes in the Undergraduate Experience 1996-2006 1996-97 Percent of freshmen living on campus Percent of undergraduates who identify themselves as commuter students Percent of undergraduates who participated in student organizations or activities Percent of students who are not working at a paid job while in school 71% 47% 2006-07 81% 35% Change +10% -12% 50% 74% +24% 26% 26% 0% Then and Now: Changes in the Undergraduate Experience 1996-2006 1996-97 Percent of students rating the overall quality of academic programs as excellent or good Percent of students rating classroom quality as excellent or very good Percent satisfied 78% 2006-07 89% Change +11% 42% 82% +40% 82% 91% +9% First Year Retention of Twin Cities Campus Fall NHS Cohorts By Average High School Rank Percentage, Percentage in Residence Halls, and Program Initiation Milestones 90.0 13-Credit Rule, Midterm Alerts Graduation Planner Living-learning communities Semester Conversion, Freshman Seminars Convocation 85.0 % Retained in 2nd Year 80.0 75.0 70.0 65.0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Ave HSR 2001 2002 % in Res Halls 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 % Retained Linear (% Retained) Proportion of Entering NHS Students Still Registered and Hitting 30, 60, and 90 Credit Benchmarks, 1, 2, and 3 Years from Entry 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 30 Credits After 1st year 60 Credits After 2nd year 90 Credits After 3rd year F 1999 F 2000 F 2001 F 2002 F 2003 F 2004 F 2005 F 2006 Proportion of Entering NHS Students Still Registered and Hitting 30, 60, and 90 Credit Benchmarks, 1, 2, and 3 Years from Entry 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 30 Credits After 1st year 60 Credits After 2nd year 90 Credits After 3rd year F 1999 F 2000 F 2001 F 2002 F 2003 F 2004 F 2005 F 2006 Comparisons of State Populations, High School Graduate Numbers and Enrollees at UM Aspirational Peer Flagship Universities, Fall 2006 New Frosh/ State Grads 1.1% 1.2% 3.0% 4.6% 5.3% 5.8% 5.1% 5.0% 8.7% 8.7% 8.7% Frosh % in Top 10% HS Rank 99% 97% 70% 72% 55% 37% 43% 90% 84% 58% 39% New Frosh % SOC 61.2% 60.5% 42.3% 35.9% 28.5% 12.9% 16.0% 23.7% 39.0% 14.2% 20.2% New Freshmen University of California, Berkeley University of California, Los Angeles University of Texas, Austin University of Florida University of Illinois, UrbanaChampaign Pennsylvania State University, Univ Park Ohio State University, Columbus University of Michigan, Ann Arbor University of Washington, Seattle University of Wisconsin, Madison University of Minnesota, Twin Cities 4,157 4,810 7,417 6,702 7,172 8,039 6,280 5,399 5,475 5,643 5,439 Calculated ACT Score 30.0 28.5 26.7 27.6 27.8 26.0 26.3 29.4 25.9 28.3 25.2 HS Grads % SOC 59.3% 59.3% 53.6% 43.8% 31.2% 16.9% 14.0% 20.2% 24.4% 13.6% 14.1% Graduation Rates at Peer Universities 4 yr 5 yr 6 yr Penn State UCLA UC Berkeley Michigan Illinois Wisconsin Florida Texas Washington Ohio State Minnesota 64.9% 62.2% 63.8% 70.3% 62.5% 50.4% 55.0% 48.1% 51.2% 42.3% 40.6% 87.8% 86.2% 84.5% 85.7% 77.9% 76.3% 75.6% 72.6% 71.1% 65.8% 57.7% 90.1% 89.2% 88.9% 86.9% 81.5% 79.2% 79.0% 76.9% 74.8% 71.1% 60.5% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 6 yr 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 1992 1996 2000 Entering Cohort 2004 2008 4 yr Twin Cities Campus 5 yr 60 % - 4 yr 80% - 6 yr 75% - 5 yr Graduation Rates and Goals
Do you have a question or suggestion regarding this site? Please contact the site administrator.