University of MinnesotaTwin Cities Campus
 Return to home pageTransforming the University Through Strategic Planning and Action

Introduction

Foreword

Transforming the University

1 - Institutional Profile

2 - Accreditation History

3 - Seven Key Challenges

  Challenge One

  Challenge Two

  Challenge Three

  Challenge Four

  Challenge Five

  Challenge Six

  Challenge Seven

Summary:
Linking University Performance to Commission Criteria

Appendices

Documents

Organizational Charts

Search for:
 
 

Summary: Linking University Performance to Commission Criteria

The Summary places the Higher Learning Commission’s five criteria in the context of the University’s strategic plan and vision for the Twin Cities campus.

This section lists each criterion and its core components and identifies key sections of the self-study report that provide evidence in support of the criteria and their core components.

Sections on this page include:


Criterion 1—The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission through structures and processes that involve the board, administration, faculty, staff, and students.

CRITERION REPORT REFERENCES
1a:  The organization’s mission documents are clear and articulate publicly the organization’s commitments. 1  2  3
1b:  In its mission documents, the organization recognizes the diversity of its learners, other constituencies, and the greater society it serves. 1  2  3  
1c:  Understanding of and support for the mission pervade the organization. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9
1d:  The organization’s governance and administrative structures promote effective leadership and support collaborative processes that enable the organization to fulfill its mission. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17
1e:  The organization upholds and protects its integrity. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11

return to section menu


Criterion 2 —The organization’s allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its education, and respond to future challenges and opportunities.

CRITERION REPORT REFERENCES
2a:  The organization realistically prepares for a future shaped by multiple societal and economic trends. 1  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13
2b:  The organization’s resource base supports its educational programs and its plans for maintaining and strengthening their quality in the future. 1  2  3  4  5
2c:  The organization’s ongoing evaluation and assessment processes provide reliable evidence of institutional effectiveness that clearly informs strategies for continuous improvement. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26
2d:   All levels of planning align with the organization’s mission, thereby enhancing its capacity to fulfill that mission. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12

return to section menu


Criterion 3 —The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission.

CRITERION REPORT REFERENCES
3a:  The organization’s goals for student learning outcomes are clearly stated for each educational program and make effective assessment possible. 1  2
3b:  The organization values and supports effective teaching. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8
3c:  The organization creates effective learning environments. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9
3d:  The organization’s learning resources support student learning and effective teaching. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7

return to section menu


Criterion 4 —The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty, administration, staff, and students by fostering and supporting inquiry, creativity, practice, and social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission.

CRITERION REPORT REFERENCES
4a:  The organization demonstrates, through the actions of its board, administrators, students, faculty, and staff, that it values a life of learning. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
4b:  The organization demonstrates that acquisition of a breadth of knowledge and skills and the exercise of intellectual inquiry are integral to its educational programs. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8
4c:  The organization assesses the usefulness of its curricula to students who will live and work in a global, diverse, and technological society. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
4d:  The organization provides support to ensure that faculty, students, and staff acquire, discover, and apply knowledge responsibly. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7

return to section menu


Criterion 5 —As called for by its mission, the organization identifies its constituencies and serves them in ways both value.

CRITERION REPORT REFERENCES
5a:  The organization learns from the constituencies it serves and analyzes its capacity to serve their needs and expectations. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23
5b:  The organization has the capacity and the commitment to engage with its identified constituencies and communities. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23
5c:  The organization demonstrates its responsiveness to those constituencies that depend on it for service. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26
5d:  Internal and external constituencies value the services the organization provides. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23 

return to section menu

Challenge Seven   |  Appendices

__________

Return to top of page

The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.